Plus, I think ratio odds are the trickier of the two, so if you can get good with ratios then percentages will be a doddle. On the whole, I'd say that ratio odds are ever so slightly more prevalent, so you will see this format a little more often as you're learning about poker mathematics. Which odds format should I learn if I'm just starting out?Įven though I started out with (and preferred) percentage odds, I think ratio odds are the best for beginners. Occasionally one format is more effective and logical to use than another, but for most part they're both just as good. Percentage odds are mostly used for stuff like equity (like in PokerStove for example).īut again, you can still easily use either format in each of these applications.Ratio odds are mostly used for pot odds.If I had to give an extremely rough guide for each format's most common use, I'd say: Note: Ratios and percentages are used for odds in poker in the same way that imperial and metric are used for measurements in everyday life. Ratio odds and percentage odds are used interchangeably in poker books, strategy articles, training videos and across poker forums. Which poker odds format is most commonly used?Īnnoyingly, there is no standard when it comes to odds in online poker. In all honestly, it just comes down to personal preference. But on the other hand I know that many players find the ratio format to be the one that makes the most sense at first. I personally much preferred using percentage odds when I was getting to grips with all this probability business. They both do the same job equally as well when it comes to pot odds, so the most advantageous odds format is the one that you find the easiest to work with. There's no advantage to using ratio odds over percentage odds or vice versa. The best format is the one you feel most comfortable with. Want a downloadable odds converter for your PC? Here's hoRatio.
Poker dice odds calculator how to#
Check out the poker odds conversion chart for info on how to convert between ratios and percentages.
0 kommentar(er)
